Great ideas love them. Colonylab aims very similar goals as I’m certain you already know. Democratizing early stage funding with organic users of each protocol helping projects take flight from the start and reducing sell pressure. The space needs more organic investment and engagement as you clearly stated. Being in both Colony and Movement communities, looking forward for what’s coming next.
It is a great approach, tho, there would be nice to see opportunities for other community members who for various reasons are unable to be in active as specified above but are continuously engaging (following news, changes) in the project (but not talking or been active in such community socialy way).
The posibility of letting some other people maybe like with lottery tickets but making sure are from the community with some filters appart of giving that oportunity to invest to those "active" social community members could be good to widespread the possibility of investment.
But i agree that the core contributors should have at least a proportion of allocation for investment as they are the ones who help all users and provide a core foundation for that comunity itself (in not one of them, i dont usually talk or engage, i mostly read and follow).
The interest in improving this issues will allways be fine.
I think you’re really onto it with you big picture. I really do think this will lead to more sustainable community engagement and shareholder harmony. How it will play out in practice only time will tell, but it think it’s definitely worth pursuing. Thanks for your contribution and I hope the whole space will benefit from this. Appreciated
I think this concept is brilliant. Allowing the community to reward productive members and contribute to decision-making is a fantastic way to keep everyone engaged and drive the ecosystem forward. Community members are crucial in giving the ecosystem's token its memetic value, which in turn creates a monetary premium. If enough community members cannot win and contribute meaningfully, the protocol ultimately loses.
This concept has the potential to reshape how projects across the entire industry engage with their communities. I'm excited to see how this evolves and how we can all contribute to its success.
We see someone with a very high sensitivity to the market. Make sure you are providing the best distribution regarding the movement. The initial support from the community greatly influences people's decisions to invest later or hodl .
Rushi AKA Cool Rush AKA Mother Rushuh: I think this is great. Seeing recent protocol TGEs it seems like a big missing piece is community continuity before and after initial airdrops/distribution. Even those protocols that managed to build some memetic or cultural value have not been able to sustain it post-drop. Seems like part of the issue is assuming tokenization is sufficient for a decentralized governance structure, when in practice it is necessary but not sufficient. Your approach tackles both the continuity and the governance issue in an engaging way.
What role do the top zealy point owner of the community play?
Great ideas love them. Colonylab aims very similar goals as I’m certain you already know. Democratizing early stage funding with organic users of each protocol helping projects take flight from the start and reducing sell pressure. The space needs more organic investment and engagement as you clearly stated. Being in both Colony and Movement communities, looking forward for what’s coming next.
It is a great approach, tho, there would be nice to see opportunities for other community members who for various reasons are unable to be in active as specified above but are continuously engaging (following news, changes) in the project (but not talking or been active in such community socialy way).
The posibility of letting some other people maybe like with lottery tickets but making sure are from the community with some filters appart of giving that oportunity to invest to those "active" social community members could be good to widespread the possibility of investment.
But i agree that the core contributors should have at least a proportion of allocation for investment as they are the ones who help all users and provide a core foundation for that comunity itself (in not one of them, i dont usually talk or engage, i mostly read and follow).
The interest in improving this issues will allways be fine.
ey Rushi,
I think you’re really onto it with you big picture. I really do think this will lead to more sustainable community engagement and shareholder harmony. How it will play out in practice only time will tell, but it think it’s definitely worth pursuing. Thanks for your contribution and I hope the whole space will benefit from this. Appreciated
I think this concept is brilliant. Allowing the community to reward productive members and contribute to decision-making is a fantastic way to keep everyone engaged and drive the ecosystem forward. Community members are crucial in giving the ecosystem's token its memetic value, which in turn creates a monetary premium. If enough community members cannot win and contribute meaningfully, the protocol ultimately loses.
This concept has the potential to reshape how projects across the entire industry engage with their communities. I'm excited to see how this evolves and how we can all contribute to its success.
Great job Rushi!
Am super bullish on what the team got, with all these effort put together i'm glad to be part of the movement
Hey Rushi
I was also thinking stable coins integration like (USDT or USDC) would also help to prevent liquidity leaving the chain
What are your plans for this?
In a case where some holders are selling
Community > VC
Community is the end game!
We see someone with a very high sensitivity to the market. Make sure you are providing the best distribution regarding the movement. The initial support from the community greatly influences people's decisions to invest later or hodl .
yeah additionally people dont like the KOLs at all. We recommend keeping this area to a minimum.
Rushi AKA Cool Rush AKA Mother Rushuh: I think this is great. Seeing recent protocol TGEs it seems like a big missing piece is community continuity before and after initial airdrops/distribution. Even those protocols that managed to build some memetic or cultural value have not been able to sustain it post-drop. Seems like part of the issue is assuming tokenization is sufficient for a decentralized governance structure, when in practice it is necessary but not sufficient. Your approach tackles both the continuity and the governance issue in an engaging way.
ty ser